Being specific, 'vocalization' begins at a tetrahedron (four points at the same distance from each other, or also, a three-sided pyramid), because a geometry, or topology of five points of the same distance to each other is no longer comprehensible by pure imagination alone (namely, imaginary, or as a SHINES).

We need to offer vocal or textual support (symbolically, as a SPEAKS): a pentahedron requires a 'dialogue', symbolism, one must speak to explain it.

Now we can understand why it is necessary to vantage beyond the 'astral-mental' level: otherwise, the unconscious will not start to converse, it wouldn't yet issue the 'Other's assignment'.

The alignment of all these levels is the term of the vocalizing, attention / 'assignment' issuing knot,¹ what at least is expressed with the work of the 'core- or pass-words' of Analytic Psychocatharsis. I am going to demonstrate, that such a scientific construction goes further than the O / O, by which Kirpal Singh was left alone after his 'masters' death.

This is the case for the decisive point in the subject matter we began above, namely the issue of succession, and which also needs to be handled at physical, social and scientific or 'spiritual' levels. No saint or discoverer has ever directly nominated his own physical 'successor', starting at Galilei, through Newton to Freud.

The same applies to Moses and Christ, as we now know through historic research. Dynasties, at the most, through an excess in worldly power (or greed?), were in the position to indulge in acts to assert their power even beyond death. Why determine a 'successor'? Even the word 'determine' sounds presumptuous here.

A 'successor' can only be someone, who distinguishes himself through authenticity, through precision in 'following'; through a development that leads along topological-lines or conjectures up to an 'after'.

1 A knot is the best geometric type depiction of the SHINES / SPEAKS. It is nothing other than a milling mass of intertwining vectors, of 'rays' that are so complex, that the individual experiences them in direct attention, and which requires to be described as the Other's attention per se. The term 'plain' suggests a static edifice. Actually, such plains are intertwined and are not geometrically or topologically presentable. The advent of a completely autonomous SPEAKS is mandatory.