For our FORMULA-WORD we need a more scientific procedure. The model of the unconscious is an IT SPEAKS, though under the condition that it doesn’t concern being. There may be a God within such an IT SPEAKS.

However, if the unconscious needs to be secure, clarified or defined, then it subsequently poetry of our age has nothing more to do with the poetry of a Pindar” or the Upanishads.

And, this is just what our starting point represented: Mysticism no longer has a say. Mysticism and science no longer have anything in common. But they can learn from each other. They could find a new, common poetry. The ‘loaded names’ in Surat Shabd Yoga have a word-sound-property which connects the lower body-chakras with the higher ‘spiritual’ ones.

The rolling R’s in ‘rarankar’ and in ‘onkar’ not only produce resonance in Trikuti or in Daswan Dwar, but also (inversely) in the stomach or chest chakra and ‘Sat Naam’ makes the connection between Sach Kand and Muladhara. However, this is a phonemic aspect. It is not sufficient for a scientific explanation of the ‘naming’, or ‘poetising’ process.

The task of interpretation in psychoanalysis is performed in a similar manner. In dreams, word-sound-pictures are often the only thing important, and not the sense of images that are already complete. I will be supplying plausible examples when I present the practice of my new procedure. However, in adhering to scientific reasoning, I will present a FOMULA-WORD now, but suggest using a different term than ‘Sat Naam’.

Footnote:

I have to add a remark here. The Sanskrit names also have a phonologic effect. Namely, the rolling r’s in ‘Rarankar’, as well as in ‘Onkar’, can produce resonance, not only in Trikuti, or Daswan Dwar, but also at the navel chakra. Similarly, ‘Sat Naam’ creates a connection between Sach Kand and Muladhara.